<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ilir Hasi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/ilirhasi/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/ilirhasi</link>
	<description>Just another Blogs@Baruch weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:37:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What I would like to write about&#8230;. by louisegeddes</title>
		<link>http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/ilirhasi/2008/10/15/what-i-would-like-to-write-about/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>louisegeddes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/ilirhasi/?p=22#comment-5</guid>
		<description>This is a nice start, but I&#039;d like to know more about the different aspects of O&#039;s identity that Homer illustrates, and for you to think about why he does them.  Right now, the paper sounds like a description of all of the different roles he plays, without a unifying theme to tie them together.  What is Homer trying to show by having such a multiplicitous character?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice start, but I&#8217;d like to know more about the different aspects of O&#8217;s identity that Homer illustrates, and for you to think about why he does them.  Right now, the paper sounds like a description of all of the different roles he plays, without a unifying theme to tie them together.  What is Homer trying to show by having such a multiplicitous character?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What I would like to write about&#8230;. by Henry</title>
		<link>http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/ilirhasi/2008/10/15/what-i-would-like-to-write-about/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/ilirhasi/?p=22#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Sounds good, it is interesting the way Homer portrays Odysseus in so many different ways. Sometimes Homer seems to be promoting Odysseus as a strong, composed and intelligent person but yet Homer also reveals a side to which Odysseus is also imperfect. Yes Odysseus was the one who saved his men from Kyklops but where was he when his men ate Helios’ sheep and cattle which led to their deaths? You can also mention how Odysseus, as godly as he seems, can sometimes be overtaken by hubris (i.e. when he taunted Kyklops after outwitting him then almost getting killed by retaliation). So it would be a great argument if you explained why Homer would do such a thing, almost showing two extremes of a character at different times throughout the epic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good, it is interesting the way Homer portrays Odysseus in so many different ways. Sometimes Homer seems to be promoting Odysseus as a strong, composed and intelligent person but yet Homer also reveals a side to which Odysseus is also imperfect. Yes Odysseus was the one who saved his men from Kyklops but where was he when his men ate Helios’ sheep and cattle which led to their deaths? You can also mention how Odysseus, as godly as he seems, can sometimes be overtaken by hubris (i.e. when he taunted Kyklops after outwitting him then almost getting killed by retaliation). So it would be a great argument if you explained why Homer would do such a thing, almost showing two extremes of a character at different times throughout the epic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Medea by louisegeddes</title>
		<link>http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/ilirhasi/2008/10/01/medea/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>louisegeddes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/ilirhasi/?p=20#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Ilir,

This is nice, but you start with Aristotle and then move away from that.  If you&#039;re going to deviate from the conventional explanation, then you have to explain why.  Also, make sure you use MLA as required - it&#039;ll cost you points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilir,</p>
<p>This is nice, but you start with Aristotle and then move away from that.  If you&#8217;re going to deviate from the conventional explanation, then you have to explain why.  Also, make sure you use MLA as required &#8211; it&#8217;ll cost you points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Medea by louisegeddes</title>
		<link>http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/ilirhasi/2008/10/01/medea/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>louisegeddes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/ilirhasi/?p=20#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Ilir,
This is nice, but you could certainly go further.  How, in the later books, is this idea reinforced?  You call him cowardly, and then explain the absence of a father means that he cannot grow up properly – is that cowardly, or a victim of circumstance? You need to explain your ideas a little more clearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilir,<br />
This is nice, but you could certainly go further.  How, in the later books, is this idea reinforced?  You call him cowardly, and then explain the absence of a father means that he cannot grow up properly – is that cowardly, or a victim of circumstance? You need to explain your ideas a little more clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
